Warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish.įresh grin_util v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/util)įresh grin_keychain v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/keychain)įresh grin_core v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/core)įresh grin_store v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/store)įresh grin_pool v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/pool)įresh grin_chain v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/chain)įresh grin_p2p v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin/p2p)Ĭompiling grin v0.5.0 (/home/djg/grin-coin/grin) Thread 'main' panicked at 'Unable to generate bindings: ()', libcore/result.rs:1009:5Ġ: std::sys::unix::backtrace::tracing::imp::unwind_backtraceĪt libstd/sys/unix/backtrace/tracing/gcc_s.rs:49Ģ: std::panicking::default_hook:: Does your target environment need CAN-FD ? They are not at all compatible.Error: unsupported option '-target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu', err: true If you have no AVR background, and don't want to use Arduino, that may be a better place to start.Īlso, you will be limited to CAN 2.0B. Much as it pains me to say this, there is a much wider selection of 8-bit PICs with on-chip CAN controller peripheral. Your own non-functional requirements may override this, of course. For most use-cases, a more modern AVR + MCP2515/25625 will be better, cheaper, faster and more widely supported. It's old, expensive and difficult to solder. I probably wouldn't start with this chip just because it's the only AVR with a CAN controller.
SUPERCOW RS WIKI DRIVER
The source is full of Atmel copyright notices, so it's fundamentally based on ASF driver code anyway.ĭo you just need basic CAN send/receive or do you want message filtering as well ? Note that the library doesn't implement interrupt-based message reception or buffering, so you need to poll frequently, or add this yourself. If you insist on starting from scratch, you can use the CAN library as the basis for your own driver. And isn't that why god gave us printf() ? ) You won't be caught out by the fact that the ICSP interface is on the UART pins instead of the more usual SPI pins.īut, as everyone else has pointed out, there is no reason to avoid Arduino unless you absolutely must have debugging capability.
It's maybe a good thing you don't have much familiarity with the more common AVR parts. It hasn't been updated in a while but there are aren't any glaring bugs, and you have the source if you encounter something major. Just follow the links from the product page on. I've used the Sparkfun board as the basis of my own designs and the Arduino core + CAN bus library work just fine.
SUPERCOW RS WIKI INSTALL
So the chances are that to use a board such as the one you linked to you will probably have to both install the standard Arduino package and then add to it a core for that specific CPU. The mega128 (and hence AT90CAN128 which is much the same but with CAN) was not supported by a core as standard. For larger Arduinos it was the mega2560 that was initially chosen so this became one of the standard cores too. The first was mega8 then developing on from that mega88/168/328. At first (in AVRs) the only "cores" that came with Arduino were for a very limited subset of AVR micros.
Things like setting up the timers to give a constant "tick" or mapping of the IO pins on the micro so that each is simply assigned an ordinal number to be accessed by.
SUPERCOW RS WIKI SOFTWARE
The "core" is effectively the "hardware adaption layer" that abstracts specifics of one particular CPU to the level that is then common to all Arduino software that "sits above". In fact "compatibility" in the Arduino world comes down to whether there is a "core" available for a particular CPU. There is a tendency these days for anyone putting an AVR onto a board to try and make it Arduino compatible just so that there will be a lot of peripheral support software instantly available but it's certainly not true that "all AVr boards are the same and compatible".
Slizz wrote: I found that all AVR boards are the same and fully arduino compatible.
0 kommentar(er)
